IMPACT OF ILLEGAL ALIENS ON THE POLITICAL FRONT

22 Feb 2024 10:31 - 22 Feb 2024 10:37 #1 by ramage
Report: California Has Six Extra Representatives Because Illegals Are Counted in Census
by: Matt Palumbo July 23, 2020


Decades ago, the relatively small number of unauthorized residents in the U.S. meant that including them in the Census did not materially change the number of representatives each state was allocated. But today there are between 12 and 14 million people living here illegally, and the number is rising.

As a result, states with large numbers of undocumented immigrants gain the advantage of additional representation in Congress. Based on the 2010 Census, the following states gained representatives because of the number of people illegally there:

California: +6 representatives (11.3% of its current representatives)

bongino.com/report-california-has-six-ex...e-counted-in-census/

As an aside the subject of illegal immigration and the need to close the border is brought up in a podcast featuring Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Elon Musk. It is a lengthy interview (2+ hrs). In spite of the length I highly recommend it, a discussion between two insightful men. Tulsi Gabbard comes on towards the end with a very good question and comment.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Feb 2024 12:38 #2 by FredHayek
Hate this. The census should only count legal residents.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Feb 2024 21:55 #3 by FredHayek

Luckily the courts prevented tens of thousands of illegal immigrants from voting.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Mar 2024 19:36 #4 by FredHayek


Democrats want illegal immigrants so badly, they are spending millions to also fly them in.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2024 14:38 #5 by koobookie
I know it's fun to be outraged, but nope.

news.yahoo.com/fact-focus-biden-falsely-accused-235631727.html

THE FACTS: An article published on Monday by the Center for Immigration Studies examined a major example of how Biden has exercised his parole authority for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.

Each month, U.S. Customs and Border Protection discloses how many people from these four countries were allowed to enter the country. On Jan. 26, the agency reported 327,000 were vetted and authorized for travel. There were more than 67,000 Cubans, 126,000 Haitians, 53,000 Nicaraguans and 81,000 Venezuelans.

The Center for Immigration Studies article says CBP approved flights that brought 320,000 to the United States last year. The author, Todd Bensman, learned they came to 43 airports but the government refused to divulge which ones, citing an exemption under the Freedom of Information Act for law enforcement-sensitive information.

The migrants are not coming in from “parts unknown,” as Trump charged. CBP vets each one for eligibility and publishes the number of airport arrivals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.

Social media posts, including one by Elon Musk's, charge that the administration is doing this to bring in voters.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2024 16:56 - 07 Mar 2024 16:57 #6 by ramage
Can you imagine if the Colorado DMV had a staff as efficient as CPB. 327,000 illegal aliens were vetted and authorized according to their statistics. That is 1258 individuals per day working 52 weeks per year and if they work an 8 hr day with no lunch hr that would be: 157 per hour.

Now you might ask what does this vetting consist of?
According to the Brennan Center for Justice:
"The U.S. visa vetting system is one of the world’s toughest. Applicants’ biographic data, photographs, and fingerprints are collected and screened against a range of national security databases that contain millions of entries and include classified information from federal, state, local, and foreign governments. Applicants must provide voluminous documentation to verify their identities and backgrounds. Immigrant visa applicants – those applying to stay permanently in the U.S. – are generally subject to more scrutiny than temporary visa applicants, including a medical examination and other screenings."
www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-...sitor-vetting-system

Oh wait, they don't need visas or ID's according to the Slo Joe Administration. That might help to speed up the process.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2024 17:03 #7 by FredHayek

Why did Democrats change their minds?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Mar 2024 08:33 #8 by koobookie

ramage wrote: Can you imagine if the Colorado DMV had a staff as efficient as CPB. 327,000 illegal aliens were vetted and authorized according to their statistics. That is 1258 individuals per day working 52 weeks per year and if they work an 8 hr day with no lunch hr that would be: 157 per hour.

Now you might ask what does this vetting consist of?
According to the Brennan Center for Justice:
"The U.S. visa vetting system is one of the world’s toughest. Applicants’ biographic data, photographs, and fingerprints are collected and screened against a range of national security databases that contain millions of entries and include classified information from federal, state, local, and foreign governments. Applicants must provide voluminous documentation to verify their identities and backgrounds. Immigrant visa applicants – those applying to stay permanently in the U.S. – are generally subject to more scrutiny than temporary visa applicants, including a medical examination and other screenings."
www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-...sitor-vetting-system

Oh wait, they don't need visas or ID's according to the Slo Joe Administration. That might help to speed up the process.


Can you imagine a Congress bitching and moaning about immigration, but unwilling to do anything about it? Oh,wait, they sort of did.

Last night, Super Joe Biden called out the Republicans for killing the bipartisan border bill, which would provide 1,500 more border security officers, 100 more immigration judges, 4,300 more asylum officers, and 100 more high-tech drug detection machines and give the president authority to shut down the border when the number of migrants reaches a certain level.

Why didn't the House pass that bill, rather than do absolutely nothing?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Mar 2024 08:44 #9 by ramage
Once again,
HR2 which deals specifically with the southern border, was passed by the House, May 2023 and sits on Schumer's desk, still waiting to be brought to the floor of the Senate.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Mar 2024 09:47 #10 by Rick

koobookie wrote:
Why didn't the House pass that bill, rather than do absolutely nothing?

Why would anyone who want's the flow of illegals to stop be ok with allowing 5000 a day under that garbage bill? Doing "somethingf" isn't any good if you allow 5000 a day before you decide to close the door.

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

George Orwell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.213 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+